Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I thought Libilia's demise was better on the 2nd line because on the top line it makes it seem like it may be a healing spell, as all the other healing spells r on the top line. As an alternative we could move all the healing spells to the bottom row. --[[User:Uzetaab|Uzetaab]] 19:21, March 23, 2006 (CST) | I thought Libilia's demise was better on the 2nd line because on the top line it makes it seem like it may be a healing spell, as all the other healing spells r on the top line. As an alternative we could move all the healing spells to the bottom row. --[[User:Uzetaab|Uzetaab]] 19:21, March 23, 2006 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh, I thought it was just an error I had made while making the tables, so I corrected it. Moving the healing spells to the bottom row seems like a good idea to me. --[[User:Ketza|Ketza]] 09:01, 26 March 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 08:01, 26 March 2006
I have over 50 faith. I didn't lose a spell with the change. so Libilia's Demise did not go up. Sorry. All I can say for sure. --Uzetaab 19:37, March 5, 2006 (CST)--Uzetaab 19:37, March 5, 2006 (CST)
I thought Libilia's demise was better on the 2nd line because on the top line it makes it seem like it may be a healing spell, as all the other healing spells r on the top line. As an alternative we could move all the healing spells to the bottom row. --Uzetaab 19:21, March 23, 2006 (CST)
Oh, I thought it was just an error I had made while making the tables, so I corrected it. Moving the healing spells to the bottom row seems like a good idea to me. --Ketza 09:01, 26 March 2006 (CST)
