<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Category_talk%3AIncomplete_item_templates</id>
	<title>Category talk:Incomplete item templates - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Category_talk%3AIncomplete_item_templates"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Incomplete_item_templates&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-08T23:23:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Incomplete_item_templates&amp;diff=78943&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Malcolm: /* Do we still need the Incomplete test ? */ new section</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.wurmpedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Incomplete_item_templates&amp;diff=78943&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-04-09T11:36:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Do we still need the Incomplete test ?: &lt;/span&gt; new section&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Do we still need the Incomplete test ? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There seems to be an assumption that all items need a Group option, otherwise they are marked as Incomplete.  We are seeing more and more items now that don't need to use the Group parameter, as they don't use the Create menu system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this check be removed, or improved to remove false positives, or have an option to bypass it ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Malcolm|Malcolm]] ([[User talk:Malcolm|talk]]) 06:36, 9 April 2013 (CDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Malcolm</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>