User:Melek/Ideas for Wurm - Revision history

NeeNee at 06:36, 7 December 2020

2020-12-07T06:36:08Z

Seedlings: /* See also */ removed link to removed page

2017-06-28T19:29:29Z

KaiH: /* Coin Locks */

2012-08-12T07:34:59Z

Coin Locks

KaiH: removed dispensable category

2010-01-08T07:41:19Z

removed dispensable category

KaiH: /* Coin Locks */ link fix

2009-12-31T10:03:45Z

Coin Locks: link fix

KaiH: /* Paving Decay */ link fix

2009-12-31T10:02:42Z

Paving Decay: link fix

Eep: /* Summary */ see also, cat

2009-12-16T04:10:10Z

Summary: see also, cat

Melek: /* Locksmithing */

2008-08-28T17:43:13Z

Locksmithing

Melek: /* Locksmithing */

2008-08-27T19:12:14Z

Locksmithing

Melek at 12:29, 27 August 2008

2008-08-27T12:29:57Z

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 === Coin Locks ===
-How about [[lock]]s which instead of requiring [[key]]s, take [[Item:Coin|coin]]s to unlock? In a similar way that you can rent [[bed]]s you could allow access to houses for a price. Getting back out of the house should be free of course.
+How about [[lock]]s which instead of requiring [[key]]s, take Item:Coin|coins to unlock? In a similar way that you can rent [[bed]]s you could allow access to houses for a price. Getting back out of the house should be free of course.
 You could have a house (with high QL [[oven]] and [[forge]] etc) with one [[door]], which you would have to pay to get in, and another [[door]] (free to use) which leads to a closed off [[field]] and [[iron]] [[mine]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 28 June 2017
Line 67:		Line 67:

	==See also==		==See also==
−	* [[Feature Wishlist]]	+	* Feature Wishlist

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 === Coin Locks ===
-How about [[lock]]s which instead of requiring [[key]]s, take [[Item:Coin|coin]]s to unlock? In a similar way that you can rent [[bed]]s you could allow access to [[house]]s for a price. Getting back out of the [[house]] should be free of course.
+How about [[lock]]s which instead of requiring [[key]]s, take [[Item:Coin|coin]]s to unlock? In a similar way that you can rent [[bed]]s you could allow access to houses for a price. Getting back out of the house should be free of course.
-You could have a [[house]] (with high QL [[oven]] and [[forge]] etc) with one [[door]], which you would have to pay to get in, and another [[door]] (free to use) which leads to a closed off [[field]] and [[iron]] [[mine]].
+You could have a house (with high QL [[oven]] and [[forge]] etc) with one [[door]], which you would have to pay to get in, and another [[door]] (free to use) which leads to a closed off [[field]] and [[iron]] [[mine]].
 People would pay to have access to the facilities until they leave through the main [[door]]. Just a random thought.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 8 January 2010
Line 68:		Line 68:
	==See also==		==See also==
	* [[Feature Wishlist]]		* [[Feature Wishlist]]
−
−	~~[[Category:Wishlist]]~~

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 === Coin Locks ===
-How about [[lock]]s which instead of requiring [[key]]s, take [[coin]]s to unlock? In a similar way that you can rent [[bed]]s you could allow access to [[house]]s for a price. Getting back out of the [[house]] should be free of course.
+How about [[lock]]s which instead of requiring [[key]]s, take [[Item:Coin|coin]]s to unlock? In a similar way that you can rent [[bed]]s you could allow access to [[house]]s for a price. Getting back out of the [[house]] should be free of course.
 You could have a [[house]] (with high QL [[oven]] and [[forge]] etc) with one [[door]], which you would have to pay to get in, and another [[door]] (free to use) which leads to a closed off [[field]] and [[iron]] [[mine]].
 People would pay to have access to the facilities until they leave through the main [[door]]. Just a random thought.
 === Summary ===

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 Perhaps we could have [[tile]] types which are part way between [[packed dirt]] and [[gravel]] (and [[cobbles]] etc). So perhaps each RL day [[paving|paved]] [[tile]]s have a (very) small chance of becoming a sort of damaged version of themselves.
-* Maybe 0.1% per day of [[gravel]] becoming [[mostly gravel]] or a [[mostly gravel]] becoming [[packed dirt]].
+* Maybe 0.1% per day of [[gravel]] becoming [mostly gravel] or a [mostly gravel] becoming [[packed dirt]].
-* It would only take maybe 2kg of [[rock shards]] to [[paving|pave]] a [[mostly gravel]] into a regular [[gravel]].
+* It would only take maybe 2kg of [[rock shards]] to [[paving|pave]] a [mostly gravel] into a regular [[gravel]].
 * Other types of [[paving]] would have more steps before they become [[packed dirt]] of course.
 This could be even less likely than that if it becomes impossible to maintain big roads... but I think that having to repair roads like we do for [[wall]]s and [[fence]]s would make sense. And all this of course would mean abandoned [[settlement]]s would be reclaimed by the wilderness a little bit more... which I think would be nice.
 == Locksmithing ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 16 December 2009
Line 67:		Line 67:

	This all could then open a new line of crafting with springs and cogs etc. Would people complain if you could build traps, levers and other mechanisms?		This all could then open a new line of crafting with springs and cogs etc. Would people complain if you could build traps, levers and other mechanisms?
		+
		+	==See also==
		+	* [[Feature Wishlist]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Wishlist]]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 It seems to me that it's just too easy and quick. Making a [[lock]] and [[key]] should take time and involve making springs, pins and tumblers (or what ever real [[lock]]s are made from!).
 We could have a new set of things which could only be made from [[copper]] which are parts of [[lock]]s (like the previously mentioned springs etc). You create the [[lock]] housing or case out of [[iron]] but then have to finish it by adding the other parts (which takes most of the skill).
@@ Line 51: / Line 54: @@
 You could choose which [[quality]] of [[lock]] you want to build from the create menu and obviously the better [[lock]]s would be more difficult. The various components would be added afterwards and would be more difficult to add on the more difficult [[lock]]s.
 This could then open a new line of crafting with springs and cogs etc. Would people complain if you could build traps, levers and other mechanisms?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 27 August 2008
Line 48:		Line 48:

	We could have a new set of things which could only be made from [[copper]] which are parts of [[lock]]s (like the previously mentioned springs etc). You create the [[lock]] housing or case out of [[iron]] but then have to finish it by adding the other parts (which takes most of the skill).		We could have a new set of things which could only be made from [[copper]] which are parts of [[lock]]s (like the previously mentioned springs etc). You create the [[lock]] housing or case out of [[iron]] but then have to finish it by adding the other parts (which takes most of the skill).
		+
		+	You could choose which [[quality]] of [[lock]] you want to build from the create menu and obviously the better [[lock]]s would be more difficult. The various components would be added afterwards and would be more difficult to add on the more difficult [[lock]]s.

	This could then open a new line of crafting with springs and cogs etc. Would people complain if you could build traps, levers and other mechanisms?		This could then open a new line of crafting with springs and cogs etc. Would people complain if you could build traps, levers and other mechanisms?

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 * Like a [[plank]] and a [[shaft]] for when a [[fence]] [[decay]]s.
 * Or 1 or 2 [[rock shards]] from a ruined [[stone wall]].
 == Paving Decay ==
@@ Line 40: / Line 41: @@
 This could be even less likely than that if it becomes impossible to maintain big roads... but I think that having to repair roads like we do for [[wall]]s and [[fence]]s would make sense. And all this of course would mean abandoned [[settlement]]s would be reclaimed by the wilderness a little bit more... which I think would be nice.