Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oak"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Re)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I had an oak at Newtown where I'd regularly plant trees all near it, including directly adjacent. When I returned from a long absence, only the trees directly adjacent were gone. The ones two tiles away were always alive and intact. A similar experiment with willows resulted in everything within two tiles being wiped out. What observations have you made that conflict with this? - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 00:55, 23 February 2009 (CST)
 
I had an oak at Newtown where I'd regularly plant trees all near it, including directly adjacent. When I returned from a long absence, only the trees directly adjacent were gone. The ones two tiles away were always alive and intact. A similar experiment with willows resulted in everything within two tiles being wiped out. What observations have you made that conflict with this? - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 00:55, 23 February 2009 (CST)
  
 +
: On the streets of Silent Hill I have planted oaks on grass tiles in groups, as shown on the images on the village page [[Silent Hill|here]].
 +
: There is a certain pair of grass tiles that I cannot grow trees whatsoever on. It's outside the assumed kill-radius of the surrounding oaks, so I have no other explanation other than that the current assumed radius is incorrect. - [[User:EliasTheCrimson|EliasTheCrimson]] 02:22, 23 February 2009 (CST)
  
<hr>
+
:: Does it happen in all directions? My oak left trees intact to the north and east, but didn't have any to kill south and west. Perhaps there's a corner issue or something similar that makes the kill area non-centered. - [[User:Dashiva|Dashiva]] 08:43, 23 February 2009 (CST)
 
 
On the streets of Silent Hill I have planted oaks on grass tiles in groups, as shown on the images on the village page [[Silent Hill|here]].
 
There is a certain pair of grass tiles that I cannot grow trees whatsoever on. It's outside the assumed kill-radius of the surrounding oaks, so I have no other explanation other than that the current assumed radius is incorrect. - [[User:EliasTheCrimson|EliasTheCrimson]] 02:22, 23 February 2009 (CST)
 

Revision as of 07:43, 23 February 2009

I had an oak at Newtown where I'd regularly plant trees all near it, including directly adjacent. When I returned from a long absence, only the trees directly adjacent were gone. The ones two tiles away were always alive and intact. A similar experiment with willows resulted in everything within two tiles being wiped out. What observations have you made that conflict with this? - Dashiva 00:55, 23 February 2009 (CST)

On the streets of Silent Hill I have planted oaks on grass tiles in groups, as shown on the images on the village page here.
There is a certain pair of grass tiles that I cannot grow trees whatsoever on. It's outside the assumed kill-radius of the surrounding oaks, so I have no other explanation other than that the current assumed radius is incorrect. - EliasTheCrimson 02:22, 23 February 2009 (CST)
Does it happen in all directions? My oak left trees intact to the north and east, but didn't have any to kill south and west. Perhaps there's a corner issue or something similar that makes the kill area non-centered. - Dashiva 08:43, 23 February 2009 (CST)