Difference between revisions of "Talk:Siege of Rolling Hills"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
[[User:Jbobj|Jbobj]] 18:23, 29 January 2007 (CST)
 
[[User:Jbobj|Jbobj]] 18:23, 29 January 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
The article is titled "Siege of 'Rolling Hills'". Rolling hills was raped. The wiki should be filled with accurate articles, not half-arsed ones trying to make the WL look powerful.
 +
 +
--[[User:Benjo|Benjo]] 19:40, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 18:40, 29 January 2007

Technically Rolling Hills fell and was drained, we didn't make it to the main deed through the caves as it didn't look like an option. Focussing on that entrance would have cut off our escape route as the heavy guards would have respawned behind us, ensuring defeat. BL troops retreated to the beach to open an alternate entrance to the caves, plan that failed since the cave network had been reinforced. I left battle at that point, someone fill me with the details from there.

--Azzu 04:50, 29 January 2007 (CST)

+1 to that. The defenses of Rolling Hills were broken, that houses were broken into, and the coffers were drained. That hardly sounds like successful defense.

All the "defenders" were killed at least once. We cannot stop them from respawning.

You may call this a JK victory if you like, but it does you no justice.

--Benjo 03:38, 29 January 2007 (CST)


As I saw it, the Rolling Hills deed is just a gatehouse to the main deed. There was nothing of real value there. Yea, you smashed the gatehouse, but didn't get onto the deed because you would have become trapped. Whether is was clever village design or our swords that prevented you from getting on deed, you didn't succeed in raiding Merkanamost. I really don't care what this article says, but I figured I'll throw in my 2 cents.

Jbobj 18:23, 29 January 2007 (CST)

The article is titled "Siege of 'Rolling Hills'". Rolling hills was raped. The wiki should be filled with accurate articles, not half-arsed ones trying to make the WL look powerful.

--Benjo 19:40, 29 January 2007 (CST)