Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mol-Rehan"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
==Worth adding details about kingdoms on defiance?==
 
==Worth adding details about kingdoms on defiance?==
I've got a vested interest in it obviously but do you do you think it's worth adding details about the Kingdoms for defiance? Similar to how we've done it for Chaos? [[User:Zundy|Zundy]] ([[User talk:Zundy|talk]]) 01:37, 22 November 2023 (PST)
+
I've got a vested interest in it obviously but do you guys think it's worth adding details about the Kingdoms for defiance? Similar to how we've done it for Chaos? [[User:Zundy|Zundy]] ([[User talk:Zundy|talk]]) 01:37, 22 November 2023 (PST)

Revision as of 10:38, 22 November 2023

Changes

"In fact, its first king, Johen King, was the source of the title 'King'." is a bit repetitive. Requesting it be changed to "In fact, its first rule, Johen King, was the source of the title 'King'." ~ Tigiot 17:42, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Protectd?

Why? Anyway, should add this:

See also

-Eep 08:02, 21 December 2009 (CST)

Protection

Please disable this or allow me to edit it, there's a hell of a lot of info I want to add. Ols 13:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Worth adding details about kingdoms on defiance?

I've got a vested interest in it obviously but do you guys think it's worth adding details about the Kingdoms for defiance? Similar to how we've done it for Chaos? Zundy (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2023 (PST)