Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mol-Rehan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Worth adding details about kingdoms on defiance?== | ==Worth adding details about kingdoms on defiance?== | ||
| − | I've got a vested interest in it obviously but do you | + | I've got a vested interest in it obviously but do you guys think it's worth adding details about the Kingdoms for defiance? Similar to how we've done it for Chaos? [[User:Zundy|Zundy]] ([[User talk:Zundy|talk]]) 01:37, 22 November 2023 (PST) |
Revision as of 02:38, 22 November 2023
Contents
Changes
"In fact, its first king, Johen King, was the source of the title 'King'." is a bit repetitive. Requesting it be changed to "In fact, its first rule, Johen King, was the source of the title 'King'." ~ Tigiot 17:42, 31 January 2007 (CST)
Protectd?
Why? Anyway, should add this:
See also
- Category:Helpful Mol-Rehan wild players
- Category:Mol-Rehan Golden Valley settlements
- Category:Mol-Rehan home settlements
- Category:Mol-Rehan wild settlements
-Eep 08:02, 21 December 2009 (CST)
Protection
Please disable this or allow me to edit it, there's a hell of a lot of info I want to add. Ols 13:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Worth adding details about kingdoms on defiance?
I've got a vested interest in it obviously but do you guys think it's worth adding details about the Kingdoms for defiance? Similar to how we've done it for Chaos? Zundy (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2023 (PST)
