Difference between revisions of "User:Urman/Wound studies"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(initial page as I collect data)
 
m (additional test results from another character.)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Note that 5.04 / 0.36 = 14.  So the natural healing of the light wound + the [6] HC was 14 times that of the [1] HC; this means that the natural healing rate of a light wound appears to be 8x that of a [1] HC.
 
Note that 5.04 / 0.36 = 14.  So the natural healing of the light wound + the [6] HC was 14 times that of the [1] HC; this means that the natural healing rate of a light wound appears to be 8x that of a [1] HC.
 +
 +
Continuing tests, light bruises and bites typically healed at this same rate.  While there were outliers, they might be from hits that I didn't see.
 +
 +
I then tested with priest-alt Fobro.  I got a medium wound, confirmed that it was stable by waiting 10 minutes.  I then applied a [1] potency HC.  The next three healing ticks the wound dropped .49 each tick, until the wound was at 14.76 (light).  The wound then healed at 4.41, until it got to very light, then healed in the next tick.  4.41 is 9x 0.49, so the light wounds on Fobro would also naturally heal at 8x the rate of a [1] HC.

Revision as of 17:04, 21 August 2010

I have a hypothesis: Each player has some (hidden) number of hit points. Our displays show 100 possible points of damage, but each point of damage we take is merely 1% of our total hit points. If this is the case, it might affect healing rates for healing covers and bandages on different players.

I will use this page to track damage for various injuries and healings to shape testing of the hypothesis. When I have enough data to make a theory, I'll post to the forums and the wound pages.

Today, Urman received a medium bite wound, 25.13 damage to legs. The wound remained stable for >10 minutes.
- I applied a [1] HC and wound improved at .36/.35/.36 for 3 healing ticks, to 24.06 dam.
- I then applied a [6] HC and wound improved at 2.16/2.16/2.16/2.16/2.16, to 13.26 dam, when it became a light wound.
- The wound improved at 5.04/5.03, to 3.19 dam, when it became a very light wound. - At the next healing tick, the wound vanished (so >3.19 healed).

Note that 2.16 / 0.36 = 6. That suggests that healing cover potency has a linear relationship with the amount of damage healed each tick; a [6] potency HC heals at 6x the rate of a [1] potency HC.

Note that 5.04 / 0.36 = 14. So the natural healing of the light wound + the [6] HC was 14 times that of the [1] HC; this means that the natural healing rate of a light wound appears to be 8x that of a [1] HC.

Continuing tests, light bruises and bites typically healed at this same rate. While there were outliers, they might be from hits that I didn't see.

I then tested with priest-alt Fobro. I got a medium wound, confirmed that it was stable by waiting 10 minutes. I then applied a [1] potency HC. The next three healing ticks the wound dropped .49 each tick, until the wound was at 14.76 (light). The wound then healed at 4.41, until it got to very light, then healed in the next tick. 4.41 is 9x 0.49, so the light wounds on Fobro would also naturally heal at 8x the rate of a [1] HC.