|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | New tutorial in progress..<br>
| + | Tutorial complete! --[[User:ReaperSWE|ReaperSWE]] 08:20, 1 October 2006 (CDT) |
| − | Please do not edit it. --[[User:ReaperSWE|ReaperSWE]] 07:46, 29 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | If there's anything you'd like to add, say it here in the description.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Eh hangon, why does this cover the same material that was in the beginners tutorial? I just updated the original to be more clear, concise, and easier to read. If you want to overhaul a tutorial you don't make a new page, you update the existing one. Some of the new info you've placed here like a description of each status bar is better than the original tutorial... --[[User:Foo|Foo]] 09:37, 29 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Don't worry.. still lots to add. It's not done yet.
| |
| − | | |
| − | That's not what I meant. If this tutorial covers the same material as the other tutorial, what do you propose happen to the other tutorial when this one is completed? --[[User:Foo|Foo]] 14:26, 29 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Keep it and let players decide which tutorial they want to read?
| |
| − | | |
| − | I can understand the need to start a new page off scratch and so far its starting to look very good, sometimes doing so is much better than fixing an outlay your not fond off.
| |
| − | --[[User:Malvado|Malvado]] 07:42, 30 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | But that's not the way a wiki is designed to work. The idea is to collaborate on each page and progressively improve it. Not for one person to decide what everyone else has done is unsuitable and craft a new page from scratch.
| |
| − | --[[User:Foo|Foo]] 08:44, 30 September 2006 (CDT)
| |
Revision as of 06:20, 1 October 2006
Tutorial complete! --ReaperSWE 08:20, 1 October 2006 (CDT)
