Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armour"

From Wurmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎rename article: new section)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
There is no such thing as the Vynora speed bonus. I thought that myth had died already.
 
There is no such thing as the Vynora speed bonus. I thought that myth had died already.
 
[[User:Robert|Robert]] 12:15, 27 December 2008 (CST)
 
[[User:Robert|Robert]] 12:15, 27 December 2008 (CST)
 +
 +
== rename article ==
 +
 +
This article should be renamed "Comparison of Armour Types" or something like that.  "Armour" is too vague of a name and makes the article obscure.  Also, are we using the British "Armour" with a "u" or not, as a general rule?

Revision as of 08:53, 1 October 2010

Plate armour speeds

Added a "naked" armour as a base value. Feel free to fill in the details. On a side note, the speeds look like the Vynorian road bonus; though, I have not been playing for a few. --Klaa 16:02, 26 December 2008 (CST)

Thanks, that's a good idea. Speed for plate was tested by Sneakypete, and inserted here to be consistent with the changes on Category:Plate armour. May or may not have been with Vynorian bonus. --Noiram 04:59, 27 December 2008 (CST)

Confirmed, the 10.89 speed with plate is definitely with Vynorian speed bonus. --Noiram 06:52, 27 December 2008 (CST)

No effect of any unarmored speed bonus could be proven: Vynora follower achieved the same speed as Fo follower, on cobbles. --Noiram 08:25, 27 December 2008 (CST)

Hrm there was a speed bonus once-upon-a-time along with lower stamina usage for Vynorians. Granted I havent been a WLer (let alone Vynora) for over two years. Ill have to pester Rolf, if I ever see him again to be sure. --Klaa 15:49, 27 December 2008 (CST)

Chain armour speeds

It appears that the chain armour speed measure was also done with Vynorian speed bonus. --Noiram 06:54, 27 December 2008 (CST)

There is no such thing as the Vynora speed bonus. I thought that myth had died already. Robert 12:15, 27 December 2008 (CST)

rename article

This article should be renamed "Comparison of Armour Types" or something like that. "Armour" is too vague of a name and makes the article obscure. Also, are we using the British "Armour" with a "u" or not, as a general rule?