Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Item"
(reason for reverting the image file format in the template to use png again instead) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: No objections --[[User:Manny|Manny]] 08:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | : No objections --[[User:Manny|Manny]] 08:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Image file format == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why did you make the image file format default to JPG? There are next to none jpeg format image files, if any, at least I can't find any File entries in the history for the past 30 days / 500 entries. Resulting in disabling any item template on the wiki showing an image. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The portable network graphics format has been used throughout the wiki, they're of good image quality and moderate file size if the [[images]] are saved correctly. I can't see a lot of jpeg format files being uploaded any time soon. A consistent transition would be if the existing png image files were converted and uploaded in advance instead. But then again, for what reason? --[[User:Ulviirala|Ulviirala]] 21:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 24 May 2010
Anyone objecting to renaming this template to "Crafted" or "Craftable", since crafted items is what it really is about. My brain keeps demanding that I do it... Arvid 16:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Also I'd really like to rename the categories of "Blacksmithing items" and "Carpentry items" etc. to "Blacksmithing products" and "Carpentry products" etc. Arvid 16:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Bump
If I do not see any objections I will make a mess of this wiki Arvid 03:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- No objections --Manny 08:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Image file format
Why did you make the image file format default to JPG? There are next to none jpeg format image files, if any, at least I can't find any File entries in the history for the past 30 days / 500 entries. Resulting in disabling any item template on the wiki showing an image.
The portable network graphics format has been used throughout the wiki, they're of good image quality and moderate file size if the images are saved correctly. I can't see a lot of jpeg format files being uploaded any time soon. A consistent transition would be if the existing png image files were converted and uploaded in advance instead. But then again, for what reason? --Ulviirala 21:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
